[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFA: libtool.m4
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: RFA: libtool.m4 |
Date: |
Fri, 15 May 2009 20:26:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello Kai,
* Kai Tietz wrote on Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:46:49AM CEST:
> 2009/5/1 Charles Wilson:
> > Cross-compilation environments involving windows variants (mingw32,
> > 64bit mingw, cygwin, etc) and libtool are a little flaky at the moment.
> > I've had a number of patches to address (some of) this but they've been
> > unreviewed for almost six months. If we can get the ball rolling on
> > that, they *should* be easy to extend to 64bit mingw by someone with
> > access to a w64 system.
> as JonY said, we have x64 windows machines and we are willing to test
> your patches. Could you provide to us a link to your patches, so we
> could verify for you. We can back post then the result of the test to
> this ML or to you directly.
> Ralf, is this a way for you?
Surely feedback is helpful.
I'm not sure whether it's clear to y'all here, but quite a big part of
the concerns over the code in the pr-msvc-support branch is not just
about regressions for other w32-related systems, but also for completely
w32 unrelated systems. Admittedly I don't remember whether that was the
case for the patches Charles mentioned.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, (continued)
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, Kai Tietz, 2009/05/01
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/01
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, JonY, 2009/05/01
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, Charles Wilson, 2009/05/01
- libtool backlog (was: RFA: libtool.m4), Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/01
- Re: libtool backlog, Charles Wilson, 2009/05/02
- Re: libtool backlog, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/03
- Re: libtool backlog, Charles Wilson, 2009/05/03
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, JonY, 2009/05/08
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4, Kai Tietz, 2009/05/15
- Re: RFA: libtool.m4,
Ralf Wildenhues <=