Re: libtool installation problem

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

> Hi Ambarish,
>
> * Ambarish Mitra wrote on Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:29:00AM CET:
> > I checked the output of: g++ -v, it is:
> > Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.3/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
> >
> >
> > The libstdc++.la has dependencies as:
> > dependency_libs=' -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib
> > stdc++-v3/src -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc
> > ++-v3/src/.libs -lm -lm -lm -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc -L/usr/loc
> > al/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin -L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib -L/usr/loc
> > al/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib -L/usr
> > /ccs/bin -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../..
> > -lgcc_s -lgcc_s -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc_s'
>
> OK.  So this is a broken installation as well.

"Broken" installations of GCC which depend on the uninstalled build 
directory are "normal".  I recall submitting a GCC bug report some 
time ago regarding this issue.  While it seems like a serious issue to 
me, it has persisted across many GCC releases.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/