bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: libtool installation problem


From: Ambarish Mitra
Subject: RE: libtool installation problem
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:59:00 +0530

Ralf,

I checked the output of: g++ -v, it is:
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)


The libstdc++.la has dependencies as:
dependency_libs=' -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib
stdc++-v3/src -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libstdc
++-v3/src/.libs -lm -lm -lm -L/usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc -L/usr/loc
al/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin -L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib -L/usr/loc
al/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib -L/usr
/ccs/bin -L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../.. 
-lgcc_s -lgcc_s -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc_s'



-Ambarish.



-----Original Message-----
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1:53 PM
To: Ambarish Mitra
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: libtool installation problem


Hi Ambarish,

* Ambarish Mitra wrote on Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:19:00AM CET:
>
> Sincere thanks for all your inputs. Since this is long time indeed, I have
> myself "googled" out some relevant information and fixed it. Now, libtool
> 1.5 is working on my Solaris 2.8 which uses gcc 3.3

So, what was the problem?  Was my assumption correct?

Thanks,
Ralf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1:01 PM
> To: Ambarish Mitra
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: libtool installation problem
>
*snip*
>
> You have a custom gcc installation.  Please show the output of
> $ g++ -v
> and take a show the .la files installed under that prefix, for example
>   /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.la
>
> I bet they contain references to within the build tree, in your case
> that would be /usr2/SOURCES/S8/gcc-3.3/objdir/.  These references are
> wrong.  I have seen this behavior before, I do not know whether it is
> a bug of the gcc-provided libtool.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]