Re: Darwin status

[Peter O'Gorman]

Akim Demaille wrote:

> Actually, what's the problem exactly?  In the tarball I
> send, the binary works, it is the swig'ed scrypt that
> fails.  In fact, if the lib made in the top level is
> lib_ instead of noinst_, everything works.

The problem is that ar on darwin has no N flag, so
I haven't found a way to rename the .o's on extraction.

If it works shared, then do that.

Peter