Re: Darwin status

[Akim Demaille]

Le 4 déc. 04, à 17:00, Peter O'Gorman a écrit :

> > > The archive contains 3 identically named files (hw.o) and support 
> > > for this is currently broken on darwin.

> I did a little research.
> It has never worked on darwin, making it work is going to be hard. I 
> really would go rename those files :(

Arg.

I have something that works (seems to work?) now, but I
don't know what's different.

Actually, what's the problem exactly?  In the tarball I
send, the binary works, it is the swig'ed scrypt that
fails.  In fact, if the lib made in the top level is
lib_ instead of noinst_, everything works.

That's fine for me.

Thanks!