[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation mistake (was: Is TODO up-to-date?)
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation mistake (was: Is TODO up-to-date?) |
Date: |
Thu, 02 May 2024 20:08:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2 |
tor 2024-05-02 klockan 20:05 +0200 skrev Erik Auerswald:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 07:55:23PM +0200, Simon Josefsson via Bug
> reports for the GNU Internet utilities wrote:
> > [...]
> > I worry about self-tests though, it would be nice to beef up on
> > that.
> > There is a pretty substantial GNU/Linux-centric self-test pipeline
> > here
> > (I just noticed the last commit broke this due to indentation
> > changes):
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/gsasl/inetutils/-/pipelines
>
> Sorry!
>
> I did not notice a missing dependency during "make syntax-check":
>
> $ make syntax-check
> ...
> indent
> maint.mk: sc_indent: GNU indent is missing
> 0.01 indent
> ...
>
> Thus I did not see this problem.
Don't worry -- that's what the pipeline is there for, and it is easy to
fix. Could you run 'make indent' using a recent GNU indent and push
the fix?
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Is TODO up-to-date?, Collin Funk, 2024/05/02
- Re: Is TODO up-to-date?, Simon Josefsson, 2024/05/02
- Re: Indentation mistake (was: Is TODO up-to-date?), Erik Auerswald, 2024/05/02
- Re: Indentation mistake (was: Is TODO up-to-date?),
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: Indentation mistake (was: Is TODO up-to-date?), Erik Auerswald, 2024/05/02
- Re: Indentation mistake, Simon Josefsson, 2024/05/02
- Re: GitLab pipeline fails to download gnulib, Erik Auerswald, 2024/05/02
- Re: Indentation mistake, Collin Funk, 2024/05/02
- Re: Indentation mistake, Simon Josefsson, 2024/05/03
- Re: Indentation mistake, Collin Funk, 2024/05/03
Re: Is TODO up-to-date?, Collin Funk, 2024/05/02