[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-inetutils] regarding route

From: Sergey Poznyakoff
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] regarding route
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:23:50 +0200

Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit:

> So I'm reworking route (for the third time since I've always manage to
> misplace it).  Question is, should we support the old syntax for
> route?

What is "old syntax"? Do you mean "route add|del ... netmask ...", etc?
If so, then definitely - yes, we should.

> Currently, I'm ignoring that, but before I go about adding it
> to inetutils, the easy (and right since it will keep the real version
> clean) solution is to have a shell script wrapper that would work like
> `the old' route, what do people think?

Let's split the task. Do it your way and I'll add the "old syntax"
later, as I did for ifconfig.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]