[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug-inetutils] regarding route

From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: [bug-inetutils] regarding route
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:11:03 -0500

So I'm reworking route (for the third time since I've always manage to
misplace it).  Question is, should we support the old syntax for
route?  Currently, I'm ignoring that, but before I go about adding it
to inetutils, the easy (and right since it will keep the real version
clean) solution is to have a shell script wrapper that would work like
`the old' route, what do people think?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]