[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] regarding route
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] regarding route |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:11:03 -0500 |
So I'm reworking route (for the third time since I've always manage to
misplace it). Question is, should we support the old syntax for
route? Currently, I'm ignoring that, but before I go about adding it
to inetutils, the easy (and right since it will keep the real version
clean) solution is to have a shell script wrapper that would work like
`the old' route, what do people think?
- [bug-inetutils] regarding route,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=