[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building inetutils from 2000-11-07 CVS

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: Building inetutils from 2000-11-07 CVS
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 20:04:13 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.1.4i

On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 09:30:08AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:34:32AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > I've been trying to think of a way to get rid of this FAQ, but I can't 
> > > think of a good one.  Do you think it would be worth making a hack so 
> > > that if a .cvsreadme exists, it's spit out to the screen using some 
> > > available pager?  (Does anyone know if CVS is even still under 
> > > development?)
> > 
> > What about old-fashioned explanations in README-alpha or so?
> We should probably write our directions in README-alpha better no matter 
> what.  I just wonder if people will read it.

Doesn't matter. If they don't read it, we can cut our reply to "Read
README-alpha", which is already a gain. www.gnu.org/software/devel also
needs a link to a working archive of the (bug-inetutils) mailing list.


`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]