[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ams-before-putsch
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: ams-before-putsch |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:54:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> You said to me that you hadn't committed anything; so what
> revisions have been tagged?
>
> Marcus tagged code that hadn't changed, so that he could `roll back'
> things if I commited anything. If I was to go forth with say
> rewamping IPC performance or something, then a tag might be useful,
> but for a bunch of silly bug fixes... I find that insulting.
There's nothing wrong with him doing that if he wants to. Tags are
very cheap. He should chose a name which doesn't sound insulting.
Thomas
Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/09
Re: ams-before-putsch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/10