[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ams-before-putsch
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: ams-before-putsch |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:43:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > It isn't acceptable for calling my I was trying to do for a
> > hostile, illegal, and a takover by force. I gave enough of a
> > warning to people, you could have said `no', and I would have
> > held of, that is not force. If this `takeover' was done by
> > force, then I would have commited the patches already, I haven't
> > since someone, Marcus of all people, voiced their voice.
>
> Marcus already asked you not to commit those patches. I saw the
> request on the list.
>
> And look: no patches commited. Marcus still has no right calling it a
> putch.
So what exactly are you complaining about? Can we please tone things
down a bit?
Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/09
Re: ams-before-putsch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/10