[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch]
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch] |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:21:15 -0400 (EDT) |
> Here's a patch, althought I left libtrivfs/io-map.c alone since it
> returned EOPNOTSUPP.
Actually I am favoring returning EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENODEV. The ENODEV
behavior is specific POSIXism for mmap, while EOPNOTSUPP is the generic
Hurd protocol for any RPC that a server doesn't support. I'm already
putting in the libc change to have mmap translate to ENODEV.
> Are there any patch submission guidlines? (i.e. do we update the
> ChangeLog for every trivial change?
Yes. Follow the coding conventions you see, and make a good log entry for
each and every change. No change ever goes in without a log entry.
> Do we send patches to any one person, or just the mailing-list? etc.)
bug-hurd is fine. If you get no response for a while, you can bug
individuals about merging your patch.
- fifo, mmap, errors, Greg Buchholz, 2003/09/04
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch], Greg Buchholz, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch], Marco Gerards, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch],
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Greg Buchholz, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Michael Banck, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Ognyan Kulev, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Marco Gerards, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Roland McGrath, 2003/09/07
Re: fifo, mmap, errors, Roland McGrath, 2003/09/06