[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch]
From: |
Greg Buchholz |
Subject: |
Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch] |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Sep 2003 01:08:51 +0100 (BST) |
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Actually I am favoring returning EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENODEV. The ENODEV
> behavior is specific POSIXism for mmap, while EOPNOTSUPP is the generic
> Hurd protocol for any RPC that a server doesn't support. I'm already
> putting in the libc change to have mmap translate to ENODEV.
>
> > Are there any patch submission guidlines? (i.e. do we update the
> > ChangeLog for every trivial change?
>
> Yes. Follow the coding conventions you see, and make a good log entry for
> each and every change. No change ever goes in without a log entry.
Alright, here's a better patch with ChangeLog entries and with the
return values changed to EOPNOTSUPP.
Greg Buchholz
mmap.patch
Description: Text document
- fifo, mmap, errors, Greg Buchholz, 2003/09/04
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch], Greg Buchholz, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch], Marco Gerards, 2003/09/05
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [patch], Roland McGrath, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch],
Greg Buchholz <=
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Michael Banck, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Ognyan Kulev, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Marco Gerards, 2003/09/06
- Re: fifo, mmap, errors [better patch], Roland McGrath, 2003/09/07
Re: fifo, mmap, errors, Roland McGrath, 2003/09/06