[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39885: Bioconductor tarballs are not archived
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#39885: Bioconductor tarballs are not archived |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:10:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Timothy,
Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> skribis:
> Hello,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> writes:
>
>> As for past tarballs, #swh-devel comrades say we could send them a list
>> of URLs and they’d create “Save Code Now” requests on our behalf (we
>> cannot do it ourselves since the site doesn’t accept plain tarballs.)
>>
>> Any volunteer to write a script that’d generate a list of Bioconductor
>> content-addressed URLs (the bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/file ones) for say the
>> past couple of years?
>
> Sorry I’m a little late to this party, but I wrote a similar script a
> while ago. It creates a “sources.json” file of all the sources that the
> PoG database analyzed and found missing in SWH. It only covers what PoG
> monitors (which is *almost* everything, but not quite).
Excellent!
> With some modifications, I used it to generate the attached list of
> Bioconductor sources (based off of recent, unpublished PoG data). I’ve
> also attached the modifications in case anyone is curious or wants to
> make a similar list. I will publish the PoG database soon (today?), so
> maybe wait for that before generating any lists.
After discussing it on #swh-devel, I filed this issue:
https://gitlab.softwareheritage.org/swh/infra/sysadm-environment/-/issues/5222
Tim, you were planning to offer a larger list of missing sources
extracted from the PoG database, right?
Thank you!
Ludo’.