[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally buil
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:29:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>>> I called that `wip-binaries', @master from three weeks ago.
>>>
>>> Thank you, that was a good start. I found that some additional patches
>>> were needed to match the bootstrap binaries that 'core-updates' is
>>> currently based on.
>>>
>>> I ended up deleting and repushing a revised 'wip-binaries' to Savannah.
>>> It includes slightly modified versions of the two commits you had
>>> included, as well as some additional cherry-picked commits of yours to
>>> update mescc-tools and add linux-libre-headers-bootstrap-tarball, and a
>>> few of my own.
>>
>> Very nice.
>>
>>> I built the new bootstrap tarballs at the new 'wip-binaries', commit
>>> c67becb31c30a5cd7685f166970ac4793e3a34a9, and here's what I got:
>>>
>>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe
>>> v1.0.1-2404-gc67becb31c
>>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build
>>> --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs
>>> /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd
>>> /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>>> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0$
>>> sha256sum *
>>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
>>> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
>>> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
>>> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
>>> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
>>> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>
>>> Can you try "guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs" at the
>>> new 'wip-binaries' branch and see if you get the same results?
>>
>> Yes, on c67becb31c30a5cd7685f166970ac4793e3a34a9 running
>> "./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs" gives me
>> exactly this,
>> also for guile-static-stripped! \o/
>>
>>> Also, I have a question: One of the changes I made to 'wip-binaries' was
>>> to update mescc-tools to 0.5.2-0.bb062b0, to match the
>>> %bootstrap-mescc-tools that's currently being used in 'core-updates'.
>>>
>>> However, I noticed that you have also apparently built the official
>>> release of mescc-tools-0.5.2, which is on your site:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722/mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>>
>>> and that this tarball is identical to the build output of the later git
>>> commit: mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz.
>>>
>>> With this in mind, could we just use 0.5.2? What changed between 0.5.2
>>> and 0.5.2-0.bb062b0, and what was the rationale for updating to bb062b0?
>>
>> Good catch. We probably can, we might try that.
>>
>> I think the need for updating to bb062b0 has been removed during the
>> review of the integration of the reduced binary seed bootstrap into
>> core-updates by Ludovic.
>>
>> For historical reasons, I think this mescc-tools commit
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> commit c184e95096881a13f29ebd7fc507fe305d3d8de5 (gitlab/janneke, janneke)
>> Author: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu Oct 4 22:03:31 2018 +0200
>>
>> build.sh: Update for mes 0.18.
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> was needed at a time that we did not have mescc-tools or mes in
>> bootstrap tarballs. We built bootstrap variants of mescc-tools and mes
>> using a externally (outside fo Guix) built mescc-tools-seed and
>> (an almost pure ASCII) mes-seed.
>
> I tried building the i686 bootstrap tarballs from wip-binaries with this
> additional patch:
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> index e298cb05c1..380cac6c88 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> @@ -139,33 +139,31 @@ Guile.")
> (license gpl3+)))
>
> (define-public mescc-tools
> - (let ((commit "bb062b0da7bf2724ca40f9002b121579898d4ef7")
> - (revision "0")
> - (version "0.5.2"))
> - (package
> - (name "mescc-tools")
> - (version (string-append version "-" revision "." (string-take commit
> 7)))
> - (source (origin
> - (method url-fetch)
> - (uri (string-append
> -
> "https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/mescc-tools.git/snapshot/"
> - name "-" commit
> - ".tar.gz"))
> - (sha256
> - (base32
> - "1h6j57wyf91i42b26f8msbv6451cw3nm4nmpl1fckp9c7vi8mwkh"))))
> - (build-system gnu-build-system)
> - (supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
> - (arguments
> - `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs
> "out")))
> - #:test-target "test"
> - #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> - (delete 'configure))))
> - (synopsis "Tools for the full source bootstrapping process")
> - (description
> - "Mescc-tools is a collection of tools for use in a full source
> + (package
> + (name "mescc-tools")
> + (version "0.5.2")
> + (source (origin
> + (method url-fetch)
> + (uri (string-append
> +
> "https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/mescc-tools.git/snapshot/"
> + name "-Release_" version
> + ".tar.gz"))
> + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
> + (sha256
> + (base32
> + "01x7bhmgwyf6mc2g1hcvibhps98nllacqm4f0j5l51b1mbi18pc2"))))
> + (build-system gnu-build-system)
> + (supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
> + (arguments
> + `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs
> "out")))
> + #:test-target "test"
> + #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure))))
> + (synopsis "Tools for the full source bootstrapping process")
> + (description
> + "Mescc-tools is a collection of tools for use in a full source
> bootstrapping process. It consists of the M1 macro assembler, the hex2
> linker, the blood-elf symbol table generator, the kaem shell, exec_enable and
> get_machine.")
> (home-page "https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/mescc-tools")
> - (license gpl3+))))
> + (license gpl3+)))
>
> And got this result:
>
> $ cd /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0
> $ sha256sum *
> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>
> I also merged the branch to core-updates and reverted the bash patch,
> which produced this derivation for "guix build -d -s i686-linux
> bootstrap-tarballs":
>
> /gnu/store/ld82vli1msfrlimjaryznrqcwm0jc5ii-bootstrap-tarballs-0.drv
Here are the hashes from this derivation:
$ cd /gnu/store/srsqilb3g70r8c7vma0gpam21z1zmg2w-bootstrap-tarballs-0
$ sha256sum *
4e5b219be4d9ad4d125f17b8a8a991e78be3908aadc8d22d1a115e96ec856279
guile-static-stripped-2.2.6-i686-linux.tar.xz
9e34b26526b184912b0d97df96e316151fd97ede24aec2f22dd13ed33438b2e4
linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.19.56-i686-linux.tar.xz
7db07a7097a7920e17f6f1794098b9f29bc3522c36a33cf797123f64581cdc34
mescc-tools-static-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
3a9b050c1a2b61bb1cbed16ee07aecdc83e9097ce4a914623aa1b9808abe57f4
mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
1ccb4f39656eb977706db7a4aa811461785200b0a11e847035bb89fef91b85ab
static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
@Mark: do you think we are ready to merge this now? Can you do it?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/11
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/12
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/08/12
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/13
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/08/13
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones,
Marius Bakke <=
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/16
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/17