[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally buil
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:03:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>>> I called that `wip-binaries', @master from three weeks ago.
>>
>> Thank you, that was a good start. I found that some additional patches
>> were needed to match the bootstrap binaries that 'core-updates' is
>> currently based on.
>>
>> I ended up deleting and repushing a revised 'wip-binaries' to Savannah.
>> It includes slightly modified versions of the two commits you had
>> included, as well as some additional cherry-picked commits of yours to
>> update mescc-tools and add linux-libre-headers-bootstrap-tarball, and a
>> few of my own.
>
> Very nice.
>
>> I built the new bootstrap tarballs at the new 'wip-binaries', commit
>> c67becb31c30a5cd7685f166970ac4793e3a34a9, and here's what I got:
>>
>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe
>> v1.0.1-2404-gc67becb31c
>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux
>> bootstrap-tarballs
>> /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd
>> /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/bg086i2qw1fn2jgbd15d9v91hyjrjsb2-bootstrap-tarballs-0$
>> sha256sum *
>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
>> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
>> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
>> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
>> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
>> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>
>> Can you try "guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs" at the
>> new 'wip-binaries' branch and see if you get the same results?
>
> Yes, on c67becb31c30a5cd7685f166970ac4793e3a34a9 running
> "./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs" gives me
> exactly this,
> also for guile-static-stripped! \o/
>
>> Also, I have a question: One of the changes I made to 'wip-binaries' was
>> to update mescc-tools to 0.5.2-0.bb062b0, to match the
>> %bootstrap-mescc-tools that's currently being used in 'core-updates'.
>>
>> However, I noticed that you have also apparently built the official
>> release of mescc-tools-0.5.2, which is on your site:
>>
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/janneke/guix/20190722/mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>
>> and that this tarball is identical to the build output of the later git
>> commit: mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz.
>>
>> With this in mind, could we just use 0.5.2? What changed between 0.5.2
>> and 0.5.2-0.bb062b0, and what was the rationale for updating to bb062b0?
>
> Good catch. We probably can, we might try that.
>
> I think the need for updating to bb062b0 has been removed during the
> review of the integration of the reduced binary seed bootstrap into
> core-updates by Ludovic.
>
> For historical reasons, I think this mescc-tools commit
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> commit c184e95096881a13f29ebd7fc507fe305d3d8de5 (gitlab/janneke, janneke)
> Author: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu Oct 4 22:03:31 2018 +0200
>
> build.sh: Update for mes 0.18.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> was needed at a time that we did not have mescc-tools or mes in
> bootstrap tarballs. We built bootstrap variants of mescc-tools and mes
> using a externally (outside fo Guix) built mescc-tools-seed and
> (an almost pure ASCII) mes-seed.
I tried building the i686 bootstrap tarballs from wip-binaries with this
additional patch:
diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
index e298cb05c1..380cac6c88 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
@@ -139,33 +139,31 @@ Guile.")
(license gpl3+)))
(define-public mescc-tools
- (let ((commit "bb062b0da7bf2724ca40f9002b121579898d4ef7")
- (revision "0")
- (version "0.5.2"))
- (package
- (name "mescc-tools")
- (version (string-append version "-" revision "." (string-take commit 7)))
- (source (origin
- (method url-fetch)
- (uri (string-append
-
"https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/mescc-tools.git/snapshot/"
- name "-" commit
- ".tar.gz"))
- (sha256
- (base32
- "1h6j57wyf91i42b26f8msbv6451cw3nm4nmpl1fckp9c7vi8mwkh"))))
- (build-system gnu-build-system)
- (supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
- (arguments
- `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs
"out")))
- #:test-target "test"
- #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
- (delete 'configure))))
- (synopsis "Tools for the full source bootstrapping process")
- (description
- "Mescc-tools is a collection of tools for use in a full source
+ (package
+ (name "mescc-tools")
+ (version "0.5.2")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append
+
"https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/mescc-tools.git/snapshot/"
+ name "-Release_" version
+ ".tar.gz"))
+ (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "01x7bhmgwyf6mc2g1hcvibhps98nllacqm4f0j5l51b1mbi18pc2"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
+ (arguments
+ `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))
+ #:test-target "test"
+ #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (delete 'configure))))
+ (synopsis "Tools for the full source bootstrapping process")
+ (description
+ "Mescc-tools is a collection of tools for use in a full source
bootstrapping process. It consists of the M1 macro assembler, the hex2
linker, the blood-elf symbol table generator, the kaem shell, exec_enable and
get_machine.")
(home-page "https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/mescc-tools")
- (license gpl3+))))
+ (license gpl3+)))
And got this result:
$ cd /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0
$ sha256sum *
3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
I also merged the branch to core-updates and reverted the bash patch,
which produced this derivation for "guix build -d -s i686-linux
bootstrap-tarballs":
/gnu/store/ld82vli1msfrlimjaryznrqcwm0jc5ii-bootstrap-tarballs-0.drv
I will report back with hashes once it finishes building. It would be
great if someone else could try to resolve the merge and see if they get
the same derivation.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/11
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/12
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/08/12
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/13
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2019/08/13
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones,
Marius Bakke <=
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/16