Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch

[Kevin Ryde]

Claes Wallin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> It seems that isinf is c99, and that earlier gcc:s supported it in isoc
> as a GNU extension. If we're using c99, why not specify it? What good
> things will be turned off?

Every time I've had the misfortune to experiment with standards-modes
on headers or whatever it's been painful.  I think _POSIX_SOURCE
losing all GNU extras was the most recent bad bit in guile.

Is isinf missed on solaris?  Is there another way to ask for it?