[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch
From: |
Claes Wallin |
Subject: |
Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:07:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I won't be able to test your patch so here are just a few remarks.
Very helpful, thank you. Correcting my submission according to them.
>> - Compiles and passes standalone tests now. Gets stack overflows on
>> elisp.test and when trying to start 'guile'.
>
> Did you compile Guile with optimizations? When using GCC, compiling
> with `-O0' quickly yields stack overflows (to that point that one
> doesn't even get to the REPL).
Ah, of course. Testing now.
>> - The sethostname and PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT conditions should be tested
>> for instead of just slapping a __sun__ on the workarounds. Please
>> help.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand this.
I simply mean that "#ifdef __sun__" is a pretty blunt instrument. There
may exist sun platforms without these problems, and there may exist
non-sun platforms with these problems. So someone well-versed in
autoconf should write tests for a missing sethostname declaration and a
faulty PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT declaration, respectively.
>> - Does any __GNUC__ platform _not_ want alloca.h?
>
> I don't known. We should normally not have to touch the `#ifdef's
> around `alloca ()' since they are the documented way to deal with
> `alloca ()' [0]. OTOH, the `#ifdef's changed a bit in the Autoconf
> manual (see [0]), so perhaps we should update them accordingly. Would
> this solve your problem?
Yes! Thank you, updated the section to latest autoconf standards.
> Also, when submitting a patch, please follow the GNU coding standard
> for ChangeLog entries and code (see below).
Yes, updating to conform.
>> diff -ur ../guile-core/test-suite/standalone/test-list.c
>> ...
>> static void
>> -test_scm_list (void)
>> +test_scm_list ()
>>
> Is there something wrong with the original form?
scm_boot_guile takes a (void*)() parameter, which test_scm_list needs
to conform to. Documenting this.
>> +static void f() {
>> + test_long_long ();
>> + test_ulong_long ();
>> +}
>> +
>
> This should really be something like:
>
> static void
> startup ()
> {
> ...
> }
Ah, yes. Updating.
>> int
>> main (int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> - scm_init_guile();
>> - test_long_long ();
>> - test_ulong_long ();
>> + scm_boot_guile(argc, argv, f, NULL);
>
> `scm_init_guile ()' is documented and perfectly legal in 1.8.0. Is
> there any reason why you removed it from test cases?
Yes, this enables the tests on platforms which not yet have a
scm_init_guile() implementation, like Solaris 10 and Mac OS X.
I have one implementation for Mac OS X coming up as soon as I've fixed
this patch, but haven't found any function similar to thread_get_attr_np
or pthread_get_stackaddress_np on Solaris 10.
>
> Thanks, Ludovic.
Updated patch coming up. Thanks again for your guidance.
/c
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/19
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch,
Claes Wallin <=
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/21
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/23
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/21
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/23
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24