[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review |
Date: |
18 May 2002 14:47:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
thi> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
thi> Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100
thi> No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new
thi> environment that shares some substructure with the old
thi> environment.
thi> ok i see this now.
However, I now wonder whether my non-mutating fix is OK. After all,
it is important that a local define mutates the environment in which
it appears... But perhaps this is sufficiently represented in C by
the reassignment of the `env' variable?
Any clarifying thoughts much appreciated.
Neil