[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2002 05:43:27 -0700 |
From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100
No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new environment
that shares some substructure with the old environment.
ok i see this now.
But, does this test need a different execution environment? It's true
for any existing test case that, if it causes a SEGV, the following
test cases won't run. This doesn't worry us much because SEGVs aren't
an important part of our plans :-)
sorry, "different" was unclear. it needs to have an independent
execution environment, which may be the same in construction as for the
other tests, for precisely the reason you give.
thi