Re: (Guile-SDL) SDL 2.0

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>
() Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:24:45 +0200

   Will follow up on this thread towards EOW.

Looks like the SDL 2.0 API is sufficiently different that it will be
hard to support both 1.0 and 2.0 simultaneously (both at build time and
certainly at runtime).  Thus, i think it would be best if configure
could autodetect the SDL version and arrange to build either (sdl sdl)
or (sdl sdl2).  I think for consistency, the other modules will also
have a "2" variant:

 (sdl gfx2)
 (sdl mixer2)
 (sdl ttf2)

or maybe it would be cleaner to have (sdl2 sdl), (sdl2 gfx), etc?

I'm still pondering the maintenance implications.  Any thoughts as a
(potentially contributing :-D) Guile-SDL user?

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen
   GPG key: 4C807502
   (if you're human and you know it)
      read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
                               (not (via 'mailing-list)))
                     => nil

pgpIKxzLSUmz9.pgp
Description: PGP signature