[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO
From: |
Gerard Jungman |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:00:49 -0600 |
So it's fine the way it is, yes? Am I missing the point...?
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 22:46 +0100, Brian Gough wrote:
> Here's the test program I used
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <gsl/gsl_math.h>
>
> int main () {
> double x = GSL_NEGZERO;
> double y = -0.0;
> printf("%a %a %a\n", 0.0, x, y);
> }
>
>
> $ ./a.out
> 0x0p+0 0x0p+0 -0x0p+0
- [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, James Ward, 2011/04/13
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Brian Gough, 2011/04/13
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Gerard Jungman, 2011/04/13
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Brian Gough, 2011/04/13
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO,
Gerard Jungman <=
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Gerard Jungman, 2011/04/13
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Brian Gough, 2011/04/14
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Gerard Jungman, 2011/04/14
- Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL_NEGZERO, Brian Gough, 2011/04/15