[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
From: |
Chip Salzenberg |
Subject: |
Re: Time to fork the netboot code? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 May 2001 11:40:29 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.17i |
According to OKUJI Yoshinori:
> <URL:http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg03333.html>
No, I didn't see that.
> As you said, Etherboot drivers have defects (for us), but IMO, it is
> NOT feasible to maintain ethernet drivers by ourselves, considerring
> that we are a small community, and the netboot feature of GRUB is an
> "extra" feature anyway. So transition to a more powerful set of
> device drivers would be necessary.
Hm. Has anyone started on this?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <address@hidden>
"We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech
- Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/07
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/08
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?,
Chip Salzenberg <=
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Christoph Plattner, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10