[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:08:25 +0100 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Avoid a compile error from HP-UX's ia64 cc: s/__restrict\>/restrict/
>> * lib/regex.h: Use "restrict", not "__restrict", since only the
>> former works with 'config.h's "#define restrict ...".
>> Problem reported by Bob Proulx.
>
> Arg, these crossed in the mail. Well, I went the other way and came
> up with a patch that should be acceptable to glibc, if we can ever get
> past the current hitch in that area. I'm willing to keep trying with
> glibc, at least for a bit longer; as far as gnulib itself is concerned
> it should work either way.
Either way is fine with me.
If you're serious about merging back to glibc, it'll help
(name space cleanliness) to add the "__" prefix: i.e., change
your Restrict to __Restrict.
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, (continued)
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/27
- enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/31
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/31
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/31
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28