[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:54:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Actually restrict-detection is working just fine.
> The problem is that "config.h" isn't included.
That seemed to mostly work. It is still failing under ia64 though. I
think the compiler there has no support for restrict. If I define
restrict to be nothing to disable it completely then the compilation
succeeds.
The man page or cc does not mention it. It only mentions this:
-AC99 Enables partial support for the C99 Standard, mode
(ANSI programming language C standard ISO/IEC
9899:1999).
So apparently the configure test for a working restrict is not
catching this case.
Bob
- build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/26
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/27
- enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/31
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/31
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/31
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX,
Bob Proulx <=
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28