[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed
From: |
Simon Sobisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Dec 2017 14:51:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Am 17.12.2017 um 11:02 schrieb Harald Arnesen:
> For a few revisions, "make check" hangs on test 256. I have to kill the
> cobc process to continue the tests. Log attached.
Thank you for posting about this issue.
The result from the testsuite.log is the following:
256. syn_misc.at:4751: testing SET SOURCEFORMAT syntax checks ...
./syn_misc.at:4765: $COMPILE_ONLY prog.cob
prog.cob:6: error: invalid SOURCEFORMAT directive option 'hi!'
prog.cob:7: error: invalid SOURCEFORMAT directive option ''
prog.cob:8: error: syntax error, unexpected Variable, expecting Literal
-prog.cob:8: warning: alphanumeric literal has zero length; a SPACE will
be assumed
-prog.cob:8: error: PROGRAM-ID header missing
-prog.cob:8: error: PROCEDURE DIVISION header missing
-prog.cob:8: error: syntax error, unexpected Literal
+prog.cob:8: error: invalid literal: ''
+prog.cob:8: error: literal length exceeds 8191 characters
+
+caught signal (signal SIGTERM)
+
+cobc: aborting compile of prog.cob at line 8 (PROGRAM-ID: unknown)
I've did some first checks and see that it looks to be specific to the
version of C compiler / runtime used.
I can reproduce both the "working" testcase and the failure you've
mentioned (using two different environments) and will investigate this.
Simon
- [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed,
Simon Sobisch <=
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/18
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/18