[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis
|
From: |
Ian Shaw |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:24:40 +0000 |
I'd go with 0.1 for the Blunder. I think that's common usage, so it would make
sense.
Then 0.05 for Error is a nice threshold ,and as you suggest, 0.02 or 0.03 for
Mistake.
* Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Philippe Michel
Sent: 08 January 2019 21:32
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis
Currently, in GNUbg analysis, bad moves or cube decisions are tagged doubtful,
bad or very bad when they lose 0.04, 0.08 or 0.16 point. These are default
values and can be changed in the Settings/Analysis panel.
Looking at recent discussions in online forums (recent being in the last few
years, not *very* recent), it seems the generally accepted thresholds are now
somewhat lower. Moves wrong by 0.02-0.03 deserve consideration, 0.10 is a
serious blunder, something like that.
Would anyone mind if these default values were cut by 1/4, to 0.03, 0.06 and
0.12 ?
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg