Re: [Bug-gnubg] Is GNU Backgammon ready for GTK+ 3 ?

[Michael Petch]

On 03/02/2011 3:04 PM, Myshkin LeVine wrote:
> > Another thing I'm wondering about is the future of gtkglext. As far as
> > I know it hasn't been changed for years and as long as gtkglext
> > depends on gtk2 we do as well.

I don't believe that gtkglext to date is compilable with -DGSEAL_ENABLE 
. GnuBG would likely have to wait for gtkglext to catch up before we can 
do anything. Other options would to be to move away fro gtkglext (there 
would be an effort in that of course). "Clutter" comes to mind, although 
I'm not sure if it works with Gtk+3 either. I had noticed that commits 
in Clutter  suggest the idea they are working on it.