bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20091229 code) - bug ?


From: Michael Petch
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20091229 code) - bug ?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:30:49 -0700
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001

Ah, Had I seen VERSION I would have used it. I have put away a change (And it also works here) to simply use VERSION instead of PACKAGE_VERSION

At a minimum your config.h has to have something like:

#define VERSION “0.90.0-mingw”

Or

#define VERSION “0.90.0-msdev”

The “.0” isn’t necessary however it conforms to the way Version numbers appear on *nix based systems where the autoconf tools are run. Configure.in currently defines version number as 0.90.0.

Michael

On 29/12/09 3:13 PM, "Jonathan Kinsey" <address@hidden> wrote:

My config.h file didn´t have this either, I did have a VERSION symbol defined and backgammon.h uses this to build a VERSION_STRING.  So one of the 2 (VERSION and PACKAGE_VERSION) could be renamed, doesn´t make sense to have the same thing twice.

Jon

> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:18:31 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20091229 code) - bug ?
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden
>
> After some research I have realized there is a good chance your config.h
> doesn't have a PACKAGE_VERSION at all. Although I haven't done a mingw
> build, I happened to look at the instructions here:
>
> http://www.gnubg.org/index.php?itemid=50&catid=1
>
> There is a zipfile there that links to:
>
> http://gnubg.org/media/BuildingGnubg.zip
>
> This zipfile contains a hand crafted config.h that is likely similar in
> nature to the one you use. The thing I noticed about that config.h is that
> PACKAGE_VERSION isn't defined (It is on environments where the auto
> configure process is done).
>
> At present I'd say simply add this following line to your config.h (Maybe
> update the Gnubg Mingw zipfile above too)
>
> #define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.90.0"
>
> Michael
>
> On 29/12/09 10:18 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I get an error compiling:
> >
> > gnubg.c: In function 'getDiceRandomDotOrg':
> > gnubg.c:4473: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'PACKAGE_VERSION'
> > mingw32-make: *** [obj/gnubg.o] Error 1
> >
> > MaX.
> >
> > 2009/12/29 Michael Petch <address@hidden>:
> >>
> >> Should be fixed now (buffer overrun). I have also added a user agent string
> >> per the request of random.org, and done some cleanup.
> >>
> >> On 29/12/09 7:08 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi a new win distrib is avauialble on gnubg.org (20091229).
> >>>
> >>> It includes recent fixes, including the one for random.org.
> >>>
> >>> I have however a problem with that: as soon as I select random.org,
> >>> everything
> >>> works fine but I can no longer quit gnubg (alt-f4, ctrl-q or the red
> >>> cross button
> >>> on the window).
> >>>
> >>> Strange ...
> >>>
> >>> MaX.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
       

View your other email accounts from your Hotmail inbox. Add them now. <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394592/direct/01/>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]