bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20091229 code) - bug ?


From: Michael Petch
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New win builds on gnubg.org (20091229 code) - bug ?
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:34:13 -0700
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001

Hmmm, this suggests that PACKAGE_VERSION isn't a string (But a number). Can
you post the line from config.h for PACKAGE_VERSION please? Either the
config.h hat is generated under ming is different or the compiler (mingw
gcc) is interpreting PACKAGE_VERSION differently than my linux GCC version.
I am assuming the former (not the latter)

If you use a hand crafted config.h for all builds, and your PACKAGE_VERSION
doesn't have quotes (Example)

#define PACKAGE_VERSION 0.90

Instead of 

#define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.90"

Can you try adding quotes and doing the build again. This is the only thing
that I can think of.


On 29/12/09 10:18 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I get an error compiling:
> 
> gnubg.c: In function 'getDiceRandomDotOrg':
> gnubg.c:4473: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'PACKAGE_VERSION'
> mingw32-make: *** [obj/gnubg.o] Error 1
> 
> MaX.
> 
> 2009/12/29 Michael Petch <address@hidden>:
>> 
>> Should be fixed now (buffer overrun). I have also added a user agent string
>> per the request of random.org, and done some cleanup.
>> 
>> On 29/12/09 7:08 AM, "Massimiliano Maini" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi a new win distrib is avauialble on gnubg.org (20091229).
>>> 
>>> It includes recent fixes, including the one for random.org.
>>> 
>>> I have however a problem with that: as soon as I select random.org,
>>> everything
>>> works fine but I can no longer quit gnubg (alt-f4, ctrl-q or the red
>>> cross button
>>> on the window).
>>> 
>>> Strange ...
>>> 
>>> MaX.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]