bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Checkerplay vs cube decision errors


From: Albert Silver
Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Checkerplay vs cube decision errors
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 08:26:14 -0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nis Jorgensen [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:22 AM
> To: Albert Silver
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Checkerplay vs cube decision errors
> 
> Albert Silver wrote:
> 
> > Same here. Later on I'll probably copy and paste this to the forum
of
> > GammonLine ($35 for a lifetime), as I'm sure a number of members
will
> > find this interesting.
> 
> I assume you are going to ask specific permission from the individual
> contributors first ...
> 
> --
> Nis Jorgensen
> Amsterdam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert Silver [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:44 AM
> To: 'Nis Jorgensen'
> Subject: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Checkerplay vs cube decision errors
> 
> Why? The posts here are publicly accessible, as is the material being
> discussed. Why whould I have to ask specific permission this there to
> engender a discussion on the relative values of checker play vs. cube
> play?
> 
>                                               Albert
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nis Jorgensen [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:22 AM
> > To: Albert Silver
> > Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Checkerplay vs cube decision errors
> >
> > Albert Silver wrote:
> >
> > > Same here. Later on I'll probably copy and paste this to the forum
of
> > > GammonLine ($35 for a lifetime), as I'm sure a number of members
will
> > > find this interesting.
> >
> > I assume you are going to ask specific permission from the
individual
> > contributors first ...
> >
> > --
> > Nis Jorgensen
> > Amsterdam

Yes, you're correct about the speed. I only accessed my e-mail out of
habit (ok, ok,... addiction), but was really getting ready for my
morning run with a friend. I had a few minutes left, and hurried to send
a short reply. :-)

(corrected): "Why whould I have to ask specific permission to post this
there to engender a discussion on the relative values of checker play
vs. cube play?"

I suppose I should add that as is usual in 'fair use' reproduction,
credit would have been given (source - author), and I would have
encouraged any comments on the actual posters' material to be posted
here in the mailing list.

                                                        Albert






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]