[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW |
Date: |
Sat, 05 May 2012 12:12:50 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:28:30 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> On 05/04/2012 01:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > That's okay, but then the configure script will have to add the
> > "-I../ms" switch to the GCC command-line arguments.
>
> That'd be fine. I assume that there will be a file ms/configure
> that does the right thing; perhaps it could be a thin wrapper
> around regular 'configure', or perhaps it'll need to be built
> some other way.
I don't understand why should something like that be done by a
separate script, since the top-level configure already includes
multiple tests for mingw* configurations.
Another issue: This fragment of src/system.h:
#include <dirent.h>
#ifndef _D_EXACT_NAMLEN
# define _D_EXACT_NAMLEN(dp) strlen ((dp)->d_name)
#endif
is sub-optimal for systems that have the d_namlen member in struct
dirent, but don't define _D_EXACT_NAMLEN. And since the configure
script doesn't have a test for d_namlen, there's no HAVE_* macro to
modify the above snippet to take such systems into consideration. Is
the d_namlen member ignored on purpose?
- Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Jim Meyering, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/06