[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2012 11:39:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 05/04/2012 10:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
However, I'd prefer a solution that uses the mainstream
configure script. Any suggestions in that direction?
I'd like to partition the Microsoft-relevant stuff as much
as possible into the ms/* subdirectory.
One possibility is to have a separate header, ms/mingw.h, which
src/system.h will include
Sure, something like that would be fine, though I'd rather
put the relevant changes into the ms/* subdirectory.
For example, we could create a file ms/system.h that does
something like this:
#include <mingw.h>
#include_next <system.h>
and then have the Microsoft build compile with -I../ms before
-I. Or, if something like that doesn't suffice, we could have the
Microsoft build patch src/system.h first thing, put the
patched version into ms/system.h, and then continue building
with -I../ms.
- Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/04
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Jim Meyering, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/05/05
- Re: Building Diffutils with MinGW, Paul Eggert, 2012/05/06