Re: bfd failure (Was: address@hidden: Re: EH notes and split instructions])

[Anthony Green]

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 23:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> This means you have configured gcc with later binutils
> then you are actually using (the flags were originally m and s in assembly,
> but was changed later to M and S (and m and ms for compatibility)).

Interesting... I'm configuring and building like so...

$ /home/green/trunk/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/green/trunk/i
--enable-languages=c,c++,java; make

I have a newer version of binutils installed in /home/green/trunk/i, but
it's not on my path.  However, the build of the target libraries manages
to pick them up anyway.  Is it supposed to work this way?

Thanks!

AG