[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command*
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process" |
Date: |
Sat, 25 May 2024 12:49:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> writes:
Hi Dmitry,
> The answer is that async-shell-command uses shell-mode as the major
> mode for the output buffer. For syntax highlighting, I guess.
>
> You make a good point that the shell history for such buffers would
> usually make no sense - even if the running process takes user input
> (usually not, but sometimes it might) - its input history would be
> different from the shell.
>
> So maybe we could just move the last form in shell-mode (which
> initializes comint-input-ring) to 'shell'
Don't know. (shell-mode) is called in shell-command since bcad49851742
(1995-07-17). And it is called in tramp-handle-shell-command since
f5e29b9b70a5 (2011-09-04).
(comint-read-input-ring) is called in shell-mode since
(1993-10-22). There might be packages which trust on the
comint-input-ring existence for buffers in shell mode, even if such
buffers are created by shell-command..
Best regards, Michael.
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/18
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/19
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process",
Michael Albinus <=
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/26
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/28
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/29
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/29