[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command*
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process" |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2024 03:19:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Previously mentioned in bug#70901.
When a Tramp connection is configured as "direct-async-process",
1. If the buffer *Async Shell Command* does not exist, invoking M-& in a
remote buffer from that connection makes it end with
Process *Async Shell Command* finished
The command can be simple, like 'ls' or 'echo 123'. I also see this
added to *Messages*:
Tramp: Inserting
‘/ssh:dgutov@fencepost.gnu.org:/home/d/dgutov/.tramp_history’...done
Which seems odd (tramp history is re-read every time like this, for some
purpose?).
2. If the buffer such named already exists when command is invoked, then
this doesn't happen (the output seems correct). But *Messages* says
-l: finished.
...which is a big puzzling as well.
Also, scenario 1 (when the buffer doesn't exist yet) takes longer than
2, but that might be a side-effect of implementation external to Tramp.
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process",
Dmitry Gutov <=
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/19
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/24
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Michael Albinus, 2024/05/25
- bug#71049: async-shell-command ends with "Process *Async Shell Command* finished" when remote "direct-async-process", Dmitry Gutov, 2024/05/25