> Seems good, thanks.
Great, closing,
Is this really the final word on this whole topic? The current solution involves a one
shot addition to `post-command-hook` in Eglot and is really ugly. Can you really
really no better solution so that Eglot is only compelled to send changes to the
server once track-changes.el announces it safe to do so (and gives the change
to send while it's at it?
Also, tangentially , can we get rid of the fboundp's and make the next GNU
ELPA version run the same code as Emacs master's by depending on
track-changes.el GNU core?
Also also, can you fix indentation in the function that you recently touched
in Eglot? (same goes for Philip, but I'll contact him separately).
João