[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62677: 30.0.50; Need to find a better name for flyspell-prog-mode
From: |
Augusto Stoffel |
Subject: |
bug#62677: 30.0.50; Need to find a better name for flyspell-prog-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Apr 2023 14:14:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 at 19:44, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>
>> > We should obsolete it and find a better one.
>>
>> Too late to rename it because it runs 'flyspell-prog-mode-hook'
>> customized by users.
>
> Can't we use a `defvaralias' like in other places?
>
> Michael.
I don't think a name tweak is useful. If an improvement is at all
necessary, then just get rid of flyspell-prog-mode, that is, make
flyspell-mode skip keywords and the like by default in prog-derived
modes. This is what is intended 99.7% of the time.
For the remaining 0.3% of the cases, it's more productive to provide an
easier way to customize what is ignored by Flyspell, using e.g. the
`spelling-ignore-functions' hook I suggested in the emacs-devel thread.