[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Apr 2023 15:05:50 +0300 |
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, 58558@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 11:49:52 +0000
>
> As you can see on the attached graph, the number of markers is ~1000, and
> it is not significantly different for the two Emacs versions.
>
> So, the number of markers itself does not look like the real culprit.
That's one potential reason down, thanks.
> I have no better ideas for now except slowly bisecting Emacs (again).
I think we should first go back to using perf. I don't think you
compared profiles for Emacs which just started with one that was
running long enough to show the slowdown. Comparing such profiles
should at least give us a hint where to look.
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/06
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/09
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2023/04/10
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/11
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/11
- bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/04/12