[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c
|
From: |
Giuseppe Scrivano |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c |
|
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:23:51 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Sure, if you are going to use my patch then I will assign my coreutils
copyright to the FSF.
Giuseppe Scrivano
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> The size of this patch is not trivial; are you willing to assign copyright
> to FSF? If so, I can get you started off-list. Meanwhile, I don't want
> to taint my chances of implementing this (I already have assignment), so I
> will not offer any review.
- [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2008/10/06
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Eric Blake, 2008/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Andreas Schwab, 2008/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2008/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Andreas Schwab, 2008/10/11
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Eric Blake, 2008/10/10
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Eric Blake, 2008/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Jim Meyering, 2008/10/16
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Eric Blake, 2008/10/16
- Re: [PATCH] Replacement for the sigs_to_ignore hack in timeout.c, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/18