Re: Coreutils 5.0.1: spurious error from uniq

[Jim Meyering]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
> |> Anyway, it's still possible that 'uniq' has a bug, or perhaps
> |> 'strcoll', depending on your further investigation.
>
> It _is_ a bug in coreutils, not in strcoll:
>
> - AC_CHECK_FUNCS(strcoll) is missing,
> - the fallback implementation of memcoll using memcmp does not clear
>   errno.

Thanks for tracking that down!