Re: mv checks that fail...

[Jim Meyering]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>From todays CVS the following test(s) fail (full log, so scroll down a bit):
...

Have you perhaps hacked ls.c so that it always prints the `author' name?
It seems like something like that is causing these differences: e.g.,

  - 1 cp loc_reg rem_sl [cp: `loc_reg' and `rem_sl' are the same file 
](loc_reg) (rem_sl -> dir/loc_reg)
  + 1 cp loc_reg rem_sl [cp: `loc_reg' and `rem_sl' are the same file 
](loc_reg) (02:28 rem_sl -> dir/loc_reg)

  - 0 cp --rem -d loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (rem_sl)
  + 0 cp --rem -d loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (:28 rem_sl)

> *** expected-22938    Wed Jun 18 02:28:33 2003
> --- actual-22938      Wed Jun 18 02:28:33 2003
> ***************
> *** 1,33 ****
> ! 1 cp loc_reg rem_sl [cp: `loc_reg' and `rem_sl' are the same file 
> ](loc_reg) (rem_sl -> dir/loc_reg)
>   0 cp --rem loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (rem_sl)
> ! 0 cp --rem -d loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (rem_sl)
...
> --- 1,33 ----
> ! 1 cp loc_reg rem_sl [cp: `loc_reg' and `rem_sl' are the same file 
> ](loc_reg) (02:28 rem_sl -> dir/loc_reg)
>   0 cp --rem loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (rem_sl)
> ! 0 cp --rem -d loc_reg rem_sl (loc_reg) (:28 rem_sl)
...