Re: [Cfengine] Re: Problems with cfservd and SIGCHLD

[Mark Burgess]

Could you please try out the latest version?

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:16 +0200, Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> Mark Burgess wrote:
> > I don't know. You need to say more. Have you tried the latest snapshot
> > or code from subversion?
> > 
> No. I used cfengine 2.1.10 and there was no statement in cfservd.c:
>    signal(SIGCHLD,SIG_IGN);
> 
> So the packages upgrade via cfrun/cfservd was going good. I have read
> the debian mail archives and there was some discussion about that 
> somebody is messing with SIGCHLD handler. So i looked through the 
> sources and found the new statement for SIGCHLD. So somebody has added 
> this with an purpose. When i change the SIGCHLD statement everything 
> runs fine. So it solved my problem and definitly also for other debian
> maintainers. I can now upgrade the cluster via apt-get update; apt-get 
> upgrade without any errors.
> 
> 
> > M
> > 
> > On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 12:03 +0200, Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> > 
> >>cfengine: 2.1.13
> >>
> >>On our debian cluster (linux 2.6.11 kernel) we update the packages on 
> >>the node via cfrun/cfservd. This does not work with cfengine 2.13. I got 
> >>the following error:
> >>    Can't ignore signal CHLD, forcing to default
> >>
> >>After spitting through the code. We changed the code into:
> >>signal(SIGCHLD,SIG_IGN);
> >>
> >>  /* HvB && WdJ */
> >>  signal(SIGCHLD,SIG_DFL); ---> This solved our problem
> >>
> >>Is this the right approach?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Bug-cfengine mailing list
> >>address@hidden
> >>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cfengine mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://orwell.sara.nl/mailman/listinfo/cfengine
>