bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/27624] New: OpenRisc BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail el


From: giulio.benetti at micronovasrl dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/27624] New: OpenRisc BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail elf32-or1k.c:2377
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:52:38 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27624

            Bug ID: 27624
           Summary: OpenRisc BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail
                    elf32-or1k.c:2377
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.36.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: giulio.benetti at micronovasrl dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

this bug still shows up with binutils 2.36.1 like:
/home/giuliobenetti/git/upstream/or1k-binutils-2.36.1/host/lib/gcc/or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/9.3.0/../../../../or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail elf32-or1k.c:2377
/home/giuliobenetti/git/upstream/or1k-binutils-2.36.1/host/lib/gcc/or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/9.3.0/../../../../or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail elf32-or1k.c:2377
/home/giuliobenetti/git/upstream/or1k-binutils-2.36.1/host/lib/gcc/or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/9.3.0/../../../../or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1 assertion fail elf32-or1k.c:2377
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

To reproduce it:
# git clone git://git.busybox.net/buildroot
# wget https://git.busybox.net/buildroot-test/tree/utils/br-reproduce-build

- modify BASE_GIT=... with your buildroot path in br-reproduce-build then:
# chmod a+x br-reproduce-build
# ./br-reproduce-build 6c87be004adf03955c832be72c0c59749f311f71

And I still can't find a workaround.

By mistake I've confused this bug with bug 21464:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21464

And this bug is fixed by Stafford Horne suggestion:
'''
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-or1k.c b/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
index 38406eda3d6..f1cfed230a1 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-or1k.c
@@ -2566,11 +2566,10 @@ or1k_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol (struct bfd_link_info
*info,
   if (h->type == STT_FUNC
       || h->needs_plt)
     {
-      if (! bfd_link_pic (info)
-         && !h->def_dynamic
-         && !h->ref_dynamic
-         && h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefweak
-         && h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefined)
+      if (h->plt.refcount <= 0
+         || (SYMBOL_CALLS_LOCAL (info, h)
+         || (ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (h->other) != STV_DEFAULT
+             && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak)))
        {
          /* This case can occur if we saw a PLT reloc in an input
             file, but the symbol was never referred to by a dynamic

--
'''

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]