[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH |
Date: |
Thu, 16 May 2024 11:58:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 5/16/24 7:02 AM, Martin D Keale
(1) it's barely tolerable to add more action-at-a-distance by introducing a
new variable; but adding *invisible* action at a distance is a language
design antipattern. Having `-i` on the `source` command documents that new
behaviour is expected.
What `invisible' action? You have to actually set the variable to use it.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, (continued)
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Léa Gris, 2024/05/14
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/16
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Robert Elz, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira, 2024/05/14