[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2024 10:52:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 5/15/24 10:46 AM, Koichi Murase wrote:
Yeah, as far as we resolve the paths by ourselves and specify the
absolute path to the `source' builtin, it would reliably work. Even
BASH_SOURCE_PATH is unnecessary.
kre made the same point earlier.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/14
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Léa Gris, 2024/05/14
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Koichi Murase, 2024/05/15
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Chet Ramey, 2024/05/15