[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Process substitution as part of a word [was: Incorrect alias expansi
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Process substitution as part of a word [was: Incorrect alias expansion ...] |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2022 12:02:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 |
On 2/3/22 9:09 AM, Martijn Dekker wrote:
Op 02-02-22 om 20:59 schreef Chet Ramey:
[...] it makes no sense to join a process substitution to another word.
But it does. In arguments that look like assignments, and in GNU-style long
options, file names can be part of a larger word.
You're right. I assume Korn simply didn't consider that use case.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, (continued)
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Chet Ramey, 2022/02/05
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/05
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/05
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Lawrence Velázquez, 2022/02/05
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Chet Ramey, 2022/02/05
- Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/05
Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Martijn Dekker, 2022/02/02
Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, L A Walsh, 2022/02/02
Message not available
Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Chet Ramey, 2022/02/02
Re: Incorrect alias expansion within command substitution, Robert Elz, 2022/02/02