[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash patches format
From: |
Todd Zullinger |
Subject: |
Re: Bash patches format |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2018 21:43:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) |
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/29/18 11:44 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> The main difference is the lack of detail in the git commit
>> message. It would great if the same data found in the
>> bash44-019 patch file was added to the git commit message.
>
> This is certainly doable. I would just have to change the script I use.
If it's an easy change for you, I think it would be
appreciated.
To echo what Vlad said, I'm thankful for all the work you do
and have done with bash. Whatever makes and keeps that
enjoyable for you is a good thing.
--
Todd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The problem is not that the world is full of fools. The problem is
that lightning isn't being distributed right.
-- Mark Twain
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Bash patches format, (continued)
- Re: Bash patches format, Marty E. Plummer, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Natanael Copa, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Vladimir Marek, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Christian Weisgerber, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Marty E. Plummer, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Bartłomiej Piotrowski, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Eric Blake, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Rainer Müller, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Todd Zullinger, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Chet Ramey, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format,
Todd Zullinger <=
- Re: Bash patches format, Chet Ramey, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Marty E. Plummer, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Todd Zullinger, 2018/05/30