[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash patches format
From: |
Marty E. Plummer |
Subject: |
Re: Bash patches format |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2018 20:08:57 -0500 |
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:15:04AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/29/18 8:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>
> >> If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
> >> own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> >> change the format I use.
> >>
> > Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
>
> Why -p1?
>
Well, as I said, debian and fedora convert to -p1 unified, as current
debian packages using the quilt 3.0 format expect -p1; I'm unsure as to
the rationale for fedora doing it. And gentoo expects -p1 by default for
patches applied by eapply (though you can specify -p0 in the ebuild, it
is a deviation from the defaults).
I don't believe debian actually needs a unified diff, but quilt 3.0
requires -p1 (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00368.html).
> --
> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
> ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
> Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Bash patches format, (continued)
- Re: Bash patches format, Bartłomiej Piotrowski, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Eric Blake, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Rainer Müller, 2018/05/31
- Re: Bash patches format, Todd Zullinger, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Chet Ramey, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Todd Zullinger, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format, Chet Ramey, 2018/05/30
- Re: Bash patches format,
Marty E. Plummer <=
- Re: Bash patches format, Todd Zullinger, 2018/05/30