Re: [SPAM] Re: proposal: simplify prologue alternatives into %code

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> I believe %define "NAME" "VALUE" is currently only used for the C++ 
> skeletons.  Should we continue to support it for backward compatibility 
> but deprecate it in favor of the unquoted NAME form?  Or can we just get 
> rid of it?

The latter, I'd say.  I don't think anybody but ourselves is using
this feature.  (I assume it's not documented.)